New Speed Cameras in NYC

 

I've just seen a news report this Tues. 8/27/ 13 that the first 20 speed cameras will be installed starting Sept. 9th, in NY around the boroughs specifically around school locations. The fine will be $50.00

POI Files

--
Michael J

Schools

I will be in New York next month, maybe I'll test some of them out. School areas sound like a good place to put them up. I'm all for it.

--
Garmin 2555LMT

It's about time

I see speeding over the posted limits, on local streets, as big a problem as on the freeways, so bring on the speed cams. The only problem might be whether they assign points to the citation, since you don't know who is actually driving. That detracts from their intended impact if points are not issued. I ride my bike around the LI neighborhood at 6:00 am and have to watch out for speeders and stop sign 'passers' to avoid getting clobbered.

--
Michael J. Moonitz Massapequa, NY C340, N650, N660, N1490T, N2797 LMT, NuviCam

I really like the idea of

I really like the idea of speed cameras in school zones. We have days where at the close of school we have a line of cops out there just issuing warnings and tickets at a rate that saturates them (even if the entire precinct is there they can't get everyone b/c all the cops will already be busy when someone zooms by).

They've been talking about putting these in for about a year now and I hope they do. The cameras will keep people from speeding on EVERY school day and not just after the crossing guards report a close call!

Higher

expo21 wrote:

I've just seen a news report this Tues. 8/27/ 13 that the first 20 speed cameras will be installed starting Sept. 9th, in NY around the boroughs specifically around school locations. The fine will be $50.00

They should make the fine $200 and that might slow most down.

--
Bobby....Garmin 2450LM

too lenient

farrissr wrote:
expo21 wrote:

I've just seen a news report this Tues. 8/27/ 13 that the first 20 speed cameras will be installed starting Sept. 9th, in NY around the boroughs specifically around school locations. The fine will be $50.00

They should make the fine $200 and that might slow most down.

Agreed. Maybe San Francisco @ $480 is too severe, but $50 is a joke. It has to be painful imho for the avg person. Such a person could get 2 violations daily and wouldn't flinch.

too lenient

johnnatash4 wrote:
farrissr wrote:
expo21 wrote:

I've just seen a news report this Tues. 8/27/ 13 that the first 20 speed cameras will be installed starting Sept. 9th, in NY around the boroughs specifically around school locations. The fine will be $50.00

They should make the fine $200 and that might slow most down.

Agreed. Maybe San Francisco @ $480 is too severe, but $50 is a joke. It has to be painful imho for the avg person. Such a person could get 2 violations daily and wouldn't flinch.

I agree, a fine is supposed to make you think twice about doing it. $50.00 is way too low.
In europe the fine is based on your income. The more you make the bigger the fine. (I know this will make a lot of people bitch) but $50 is a lot to some people and pennies to others.

--
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things!

Agreed...

They should take notes from here: http://autos.aol.com/article/highest-speeding-fines/

I especially like this part:

Quote:

Portugal
Highest Fines: $1800
While the maximum fine for speeding can top $1800 depending on an offender's income and the road conditions where the offense occurred, we're a little more concerned with the trend toward on-the-spot fines that are collected by the local constabulary for offenses ranging from speeding to driving while talking into a phone or failing to buckle up even in the back seats. Interestingly, most of the police vehicles are equipped with mobile ATM machines so there is no need for police to march a driver to a faraway cash point. Drivers who can't pay are forbidden to drive. But who, we ask, regularly has $1800 on hand, or a credit or debit card withdrawal limit to match? And what happened to innocent until proven guilty?

--
Striving to make the NYC Metro area project the best.

Only Schools

expo21 wrote:

I've just seen a news report this Tues. 8/27/ 13 that the first 20 speed cameras will be installed starting Sept. 9th, in NY around the boroughs specifically around school locations. The fine will be $50.00

The 20 speed cameras will ONLY be installed (they are of the mobile type) in school zones.. They will be in effect 1 hour prior to school hours to 1 hour after school.. To be fined, you must be going 10 mph over the school limit.. I think it was 1350 feet prior to the school zone and 1350 feet after the zone.. If I find the paperwork the State gave me I'll fill you in with the rest of the law..

10 mph is pretty lenient

10 mph is pretty lenient IMO. So is the $50! Why not make it the same fine as if a cop pulls you over in a school zone?

They are getting sneaky

I just seen a photo of a camera mounted in a crash barrier, looking at the barrier at 100km you wouldn't even notice, till the ticket arrived in the mail

--
Today is a gift, that's why they call it the present...

Ban Them

ShenanigansNZ wrote:

I just seen a photo of a camera mounted in a crash barrier, looking at the barrier at 100km you wouldn't even notice, till the ticket arrived in the mail

Thats because the cameras are not about safety. They want to maximize the amount of money that comes in. The cameras need to be banned, plain and simple.

something missing

WuLabsWuTecH wrote:

10 mph is pretty lenient IMO. So is the $50! Why not make it the same fine as if a cop pulls you over in a school zone?

I didn't see anything mentioned about the crack down on speeding on I-80 over the last week at least in Iowa. the supposed point of the crack down was break drivers of the notion that it was ok to go 5 over the speed limit.

Volume vs. Margin

tomturtle wrote:
ShenanigansNZ wrote:

I just seen a photo of a camera mounted in a crash barrier, looking at the barrier at 100km you wouldn't even notice, till the ticket arrived in the mail

Thats because the cameras are not about safety. They want to maximize the amount of money that comes in. The cameras need to be banned, plain and simple.

Which is possibly why only a $50 fine and 10mph grace. Many drivers will just not worry about it with those parameters, thereby increasing the city's coffers by volume of violators. An old retail formula being put to new use.

The danger of doing this in

The danger of doing this in NY is that New Yorkers may take hostile action to the cameras. Getting the populace really angry is not a winning situation.

Fred

Hostile action

As a driver in NY for more than 50 years, trust me, New Yorkers' DON"T take "hostile " action over safety cameras.Please keep your paranoia of NY in check. Especially when the fine will only be $50.00. Our double parking tickets are $115.00. Now that is something to get hostile about, and we don't even do it over that.

--
Michael J

Give Us Time

For New York State, this is a trial balloon. Give it a year or two and the system will be changed to 5MPH and $150. Add another two years and you will see 1MPH and $300. Once they get a taste of the money, they will do whatever they can to increase it. I fully expect them to expand the program to Long Island and the major highways. We are limited (in theory) to 55MPH on the major highways and many of the secondaries have been dropped from 55MPH to 50MPH or even 40MPH now. This will bring in a lot of money.

--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.

Ban the Cameras

Maybe when the fines get more frequent and costly the people will finally get some action to ban the cameras.

--
romanviking

We're a long ways away from

We're a long ways away from a camera ticketing at 1 mph. Most officers who are participating in crackdowns won't even ticket until 5 because of the mount of calibration that has to be constantly redone at 1 mph.

Our school zone enforcement will pull you over at 21 (in a 20) but to issue you a warning and ask you to slow down when kids are present. At 25 is when they start ticketing. I think that's a fair policy, and if speed cameras ticketed at the same rate that cops do, I would have nothing against it. I'm guessing the 10 mph grace is just to make it so the cameras don't have to be calibrated that often?

Speed limit signs in question

finbar wrote:

The 20 speed cameras will ONLY be installed (they are of the mobile type) in school zones.. They will be in effect 1 hour prior to school hours to 1 hour after school.. To be fined, you must be going 10 mph over the school limit.. I think it was 1350 feet prior to the school zone and 1350 feet after the zone.. If I find the paperwork the State gave me I'll fill you in with the rest of the law..

All correct finbar! Here is the law -

http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/LAWSSEAF.cgi?QUERYTYPE=LAWS+&QUERYDATA=$$VAT1180-B$$@TXVAT01180-B+&LIST=SEA2+&BROWSER=BROWSER+&TOKEN=39948966+&TARGET=VIEW

The law says the city MAY post signs that a speed camera is in use. Existing school speed limit signs may not be 1350 feet away from the school. Other sections of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law require the existing speed limit signs to include the school hours.

dobs108

All part of the slippery slope

Like someone said above, it starts at school zones with restricted hours and a small fine. All of it will expand as time goes on and the populace grows accustomed to it and the politicians look for a way to raise revenue without raising taxes.

Not So Fast

WuLabsWuTecH wrote:

We're a long ways away from a camera ticketing at 1 mph. Most officers who are participating in crackdowns won't even ticket until 5 because of the mount of calibration that has to be constantly redone at 1 mph.

Don't be so sure about that. There are several articles available via Google about the practice already in place:

http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/95181939.html

"Drivers recorded exceeding the speed limit by up to 5 mph will be fined $25." The key phrase is "up to" meaning 1 to 5.

Chicago is toying with the 1MPH over idea as well. Basically it will boil down to the recipient of a ticket having to take a day off from work and going to court to fight it. Just like a red light camera. I assume the government's point of view is that most people will pay it because there are no points or insurance surcharges. The few that do challenge it will probably be found guilty anyhow thus making the whole exercise a waste of time.

--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.

I Have My Paranoia

I have my paranoia in check. I grew up in NYC.
What's not in check is the municipalities & the many creative ways they've taken to "enhance" their budgets. What's foolish is that their constituents either don't understand or don't care.

Fred

expo21 wrote:

As a driver in NY for more than 50 years, trust me, New Yorkers' DON"T take "hostile " action over safety cameras.Please keep your paranoia of NY in check. Especially when the fine will only be $50.00. Our double parking tickets are $115.00. Now that is something to get hostile about, and we don't even do it over that.

NYC Cameras

NYC of late has been putting SPEED BUMPS in 'school zones' be they public or private schools.

Cameras should be an interesting addition in these zones! smile

ML

--
Freedom isn't free...thank you veterans! Heard about the tests to detect PANCREATIC CANCER? There aren't any! In Memoriam: #77 NYPD-SCA/Seattle Mike/Joe S./Vinny D./RTC!

Wait, what?

scott_dog wrote:

Like someone said above, it starts at school zones with restricted hours and a small fine. All of it will expand as time goes on and the populace grows accustomed to it and the politicians look for a way to raise revenue without raising taxes.

Wait a second, isn't it a good thing to be able to raise more revenue WITHOUT raising my taxes on my hard-earned money???

Interesting...

Aardvark wrote:
WuLabsWuTecH wrote:

We're a long ways away from a camera ticketing at 1 mph. Most officers who are participating in crackdowns won't even ticket until 5 because of the mount of calibration that has to be constantly redone at 1 mph.

Don't be so sure about that. There are several articles available via Google about the practice already in place:

http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/95181939.html

"Drivers recorded exceeding the speed limit by up to 5 mph will be fined $25." The key phrase is "up to" meaning 1 to 5.

Chicago is toying with the 1MPH over idea as well. Basically it will boil down to the recipient of a ticket having to take a day off from work and going to court to fight it. Just like a red light camera. I assume the government's point of view is that most people will pay it because there are no points or insurance surcharges. The few that do challenge it will probably be found guilty anyhow thus making the whole exercise a waste of time.

Interesting... But if they have the technology to make it accurate to +/- 1 mph, I say go for it! But I wouldn't think that that technology (if it even exists at this consumer level) would be cheap enough to make it cost effective.

There is of course another thing to keep in mind. What they say and what they actually do might be two different things. They might SAY they are allowed to ticket at 1mph over, but might not actually do it. It might just be to get people to slow down. Of course our law enforcement's opinion around here is it doesn't matter how we make the roads safer, just that we do. If placing an empty police care of a box on a pole with wires coming out of it gets people to slow down, then so be it!

Ugh, speed bumps...

Mike L. wrote:

NYC of late has been putting SPEED BUMPS in 'school zones' be they public or private schools.

Cameras should be an interesting addition in these zones! smile

ML

Unless they are retractable speed bumps, why would you put in permanent fixtures for traffic calming for speeds that need to be achieved for 2-3 hours out of the day and about 180 days out of the year? Keep the camera, tear down the speed bumps!

Of course I'm also biased against speed bumps--do you know how it feels to go over one of those things in a Fire Engine or an Ambulance? Not comfortable!!! It also slows down our response by quite a lot--we have a 60 second response time to most places in our area except for the street with speed bumps. It takes about 3-4 minutes to navigate that street sad

how about

AfroDuck? They guy even stopped at all red lights, and Commish Kelly is out to get him?

http://youtu.be/v_4ghLXaEVM

cams in NYC

johnnatash4 wrote:

AfroDuck? They guy even stopped at all red lights, and Commish Kelly is out to get him?

http://youtu.be/v_4ghLXaEVM

He got arrested. I guess cameras don't lie. The irony is he stopped at all red lights.

?

johnnatash4 wrote:
johnnatash4 wrote:

AfroDuck? They guy even stopped at all red lights, and Commish Kelly is out to get him?

http://youtu.be/v_4ghLXaEVM

He got arrested. I guess cameras don't lie. The irony is he stopped at all red lights.

How did you find out he was arrested? I would love to know who he was and his attitude towards total disreguard for others safety..

what NYPD commish wants

finbar wrote:
johnnatash4 wrote:
johnnatash4 wrote:

AfroDuck? They guy even stopped at all red lights, and Commish Kelly is out to get him?

http://youtu.be/v_4ghLXaEVM

He got arrested. I guess cameras don't lie. The irony is he stopped at all red lights.

How did you find out he was arrested? I would love to know who he was and his attitude towards total disreguard for others safety..

It's interesting that if a police commissioner wants someone, NYPD will get him/her. It only took 8 days. Social media is interesting, he could have done this 10 times, but not posted to youtube, and he would be fine. Again, he stopped at the red lights, watch his video.

PS NYC--how do you know how fast he was going? Is it based on the premise of his time and distance? The other day, aerospace engineers invented something call the pc, and video editing software. Maybe AfroDuck has something up his sleeve.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/cops-arrest-speedster-...

Not real..

Cops also took away the BMW — with a maximum speed of 155 mph — driven by the racing madman.

Don't think his BMW did 155mph.. Quoting for effect how fast a car can go doesn't indicate he actually went that fast.. It's all made up.. Smoke and mirrors. And if this is real he should never drive a car again..

in New York

welcome to NY

--
Gattina11

the BMW

its all bull

--
Gattina11

Speed Cameras

I live in Lindenhurst NY and not all school yet having installed anything to expensive for NY,

--
Gattina11

Speed Cameras

I live in Lindenhurst NY and not all school yet having installed anything to expensive for NY, we keeping dreaming to keep our kids save

--
Gattina11

not capable of 155

finbar wrote:

Cops also took away the BMW — with a maximum speed of 155 mph — driven by the racing madman.

Don't think his BMW did 155mph.. Quoting for effect how fast a car can go doesn't indicate he actually went that fast.. It's all made up.. Smoke and mirrors. And if this is real he should never drive a car again..

Mass media is funny. Anybody who knows cars can see that the BMW is a Z4 without zsp and the 3.0 version, not the 3.5. It is NOT capable of 155, it would be limited to 130. The media says anything they want, but they would make very poor FBI agents where details do matter.

But it shows how if you f*** with NYC, it has the resources to dispose of you any way it wants to. A modern day Billy the Kid.

time is money.....

time is money.....

--
A GPS can take you where You want to go but never where you WANT to be.

I just got my ticket

I just got my ticket $80.00 in Suffolk county NY long island . brand new red light camera .

--
Gattina11

Which one?

gattina11 wrote:

I just got my ticket $80.00 in Suffolk county NY long island . brand new red light camera .

Which camera? One of the new ones around West Babylon?

--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.