Interesting article

 

Ran across this article and was surprised by it.

http://www.thecarconnection.com/marty-blog/1036043_survey-fi...

"Survey Finds Strong Support For Red-Light Cameras—In New York
October 2nd, 2009
By Bengt Halvorson

A new survey from the well-respected research firm Public Opinion Strategies suggests that New York state voters support the use of red-light cameras—at least when it comes to the most dangerous intersections.

In the statewide survey conducted for American Traffic Solutions (ATS), one of the leading photo-enforcement providers and the company operating programs in New York City and Nassau County, 77 percent support the systems while just 18 percent were opposed.

Within New York City, support rated highest, at 85 percent in favor and just 12 percent in opposition (two-thirds overall believed that they increase safety), while in upstate New York, 69 percent supported the cameras and 24 percent opposed them.

POS revealed that support rated higher for women than men and higher for African Americans than whites.

Responses change slightly when subjects were asked about whether neighbors shared their opinion; only 39 percent thought that their neighbors supported the use of the cameras.

Earlier this year the research firm had found that 69 percent of Americans support red-light cameras, while 47 percent thought that most residents in their state opposed the systems. Those results were based on a national survey of 800 likely voters, but the primary question was worded in this way: "Do you support or oppose the use of red-light cameras to detect red-light runners and enforce traffic laws in your state’s most dangerous intersections?"

At that time Neil Newhouse, a founding partner of POS, said, "Rarely in public opinion research do you find voter attitudes so at odds with what they believe others think. These red-light camera supporters are truly the ‘silent majority,’ while opponents might be described as a vocal minority.”

Surprisingly, the New York poll also found strong support for speed enforcement cameras, with 65 percent supporting them on general roadways and highways, 77 percent supporting them for construction zones, and 88 percent for school zones.

ATS says that in New York City, red-light violations have been reduced by 73 percent overall with a program run by the company.

Although the role of speed cameras on accidents, injuries, and fatalities hasn't yet been proven, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) points to several studies suggesting a decrease in crashes near camera sites. Red-light cameras have been shown to reduce injury crashes by 25 to 30 percent, according to the IIHS and reduce actual running violations by up to 50 percent. Yet several smaller studies have suggested that while the rate of serious accidents dropped at these intersections, the overall rates of accidents and injuries in some of them has risen—for instance, from rear-end collisions. "

Take it for what it's worth...

Without knowing the exact questions asked it's difficult to determine if the survey was a fair and a true represetation of drivers views.
A survey can have the questions made up to lead the person taking the survey to where they want the answers to be and given the maker, seller and installer of the equipment was paying for the survey it's not surprising what the results are purported to be.

Agreed that sponsored surveys usually have a biased purpose

However, what amazed me were the numbers. Statistically - even with massive error margins - one would have to say that most people support Automated Traffic enforcement.

I would certainly not have thought that - especially with the vehement opposition usually expressed on our own site here.

"Those results were based on

"Those results were based on a national survey of 800 likely voters"

I do not think a survey of 800 people would represent the nation very well. The survey should be more like 80,000 people.

--
Beechcreek

Was Against, But Changed My Mind

I was against the whole big brother thing with traffic cameras and the "revenue generator" aspect. But earlier this year I suddenly noticed a surge in redlight running here on Long Island. Even had two close calls myself with idiots that had well over three seconds of red on their light just blowing it off and nearly taking me out. That started to change my mind. At this point I don't really care who is doing the enforcement as long as these guys get nailed in the pocket, HARD!

--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.

Come election time...

tazz49 wrote:

"Those results were based on a national survey of 800 likely voters"

I do not think a survey of 800 people would represent the nation very well. The survey should be more like 80,000 people.

Come election time, please check the data that underlies the national polls and report back as to the number they use, please.

...

tazz49 wrote:

"Those results were based on a national survey of 800 likely voters"

I do not think a survey of 800 people would represent the nation very well. The survey should be more like 80,000 people.

I agree. It can't even be considered as a "study."

--
Michael (Nuvi 2639LMT)

Rather than wait for national election polling...

Cyberian75 wrote:
tazz49 wrote:

"Those results were based on a national survey of 800 likely voters"

I do not think a survey of 800 people would represent the nation very well. The survey should be more like 80,000 people.

I agree. It can't even be considered as a "study."

Rather than wait for national election polling as I suggested above, you might go here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_poll

Polls..

As one poster said.. "depending on how you word the questions you can get whatever answer you're looking for".

Nuvi1300WTGPS

--
I'm not really lost.... just temporarily misplaced!