Who Has Given Up Their Camera For Their Smartphone?

 

Personal Disclaimer: for me, the quality of smartphone cameras is a LONG way from what I want to trade even my simple point-and-shoot for my SG2's camera feature. There used to be a phrase that went "It's all about the glass" referring to the lens. The better the lens, the better the picture...but I digress.

For a quick pic to remember my parking spot at the airport or something else I don't plan to keep, it's nice to have. However, while I personally won't be giving up any of my cameras for the camera feature on my SG2, I realize many other folks have.

Have you?

--
Shooter N32 39 W97 25 VIA 1535TM, Lexus built-in, TomTom Go
1 ... 3 4 5 6
<<Page 7

.

johnnatash4 wrote:
chewbacca wrote:
johnnatash4 wrote:

Just got a deal on a D5500, with a 18-55 VRII 3-5.6, and 55-300 VR 4.5-5.6. I've never had a VR lense and don't plan on switching it on.

I'm curious, why don't you want to use VR? It helps especially if your hands aren't as steady as they can be.

I don't know how the VR actually works, and my 2005 18-55 DX didn't have it. Kinda like when a new car has traction and stability and ABS, you turn it all off cuz you didn't have it when you were 16 and learned to drive (joking)....

I know it helps compensate camera shakes when the shutter speed is slow (or below the recommended speed). I don't know what happens exactly behind the scene.

Try it yourself. Set your camera to aperture value mode. Take a handheld shot (preferably indoor where the light isn't bright enough) of still objects with the VR off. If the shutter speed is too high, close the aperture more until shutter drops below 1/50 sec and you get an image that is not so sharp. Then switch on VR and take another shot at exactly the same shutter, aperture, ISO settings. You should see a sharp image with the VR switched on.

Shooter wrote: Personal

Shooter wrote:

Personal Disclaimer: for me, the quality of smartphone cameras is a LONG way from what I want to trade even my simple point-and-shoot for my SG2's camera feature. There used to be a phrase that went "It's all about the glass" referring to the lens. The better the lens, the better the picture...but I digress.

For a quick pic to remember my parking spot at the airport or something else I don't plan to keep, it's nice to have. However, while I personally won't be giving up any of my cameras for the camera feature on my SG2, I realize many other folks have.

Have you?

Again as I mentioned most kids today can't drive a vehicle with a clutch. Similarly, they likely would not know what 50 mm 1.8 vs. 50 mm 1.4 even means, and when APS-C there is a 1.5x factor. What I mean, is in concept. I myself know what VR and VRII mean in concept, but have never used it....

Here's a way to put one's money where one's mouth is...if a iPhone 6 takes great pix, take all your pics with it when you have a baby born. I think at some point, a person would be very disappointed with what they've got. They sure were nice on Instagram and facebook, but blow it up to 8x10 and see.....(people will say 8x10 just fine, to which I have no repsonse if we keep it politically correct lol)

will try

chewbacca wrote:
johnnatash4 wrote:
chewbacca wrote:
johnnatash4 wrote:

Just got a deal on a D5500, with a 18-55 VRII 3-5.6, and 55-300 VR 4.5-5.6. I've never had a VR lense and don't plan on switching it on.

I'm curious, why don't you want to use VR? It helps especially if your hands aren't as steady as they can be.

I don't know how the VR actually works, and my 2005 18-55 DX didn't have it. Kinda like when a new car has traction and stability and ABS, you turn it all off cuz you didn't have it when you were 16 and learned to drive (joking)....

I know it helps compensate camera shakes when the shutter speed is slow (or below the recommended speed). I don't know what happens exactly behind the scene.

Try it yourself. Set your camera to aperture value mode. Take a handheld shot (preferably indoor where the light isn't bright enough) of still objects with the VR off. If the shutter speed is too high, close the aperture more until shutter drops below 1/50 sec and you get an image that is not so sharp. Then switch on VR and take another shot at exactly the same shutter, aperture, ISO settings. You should see a sharp image with the VR switched on.

it, see what it does....might just put my traction and stability back on in my car too (just joking)

VR for lens

VR works with some limitations. It doesn't guarantee good pictures with slow shutter speed. Usually it will be about two f-stops slower than without it. Unless you have very steady hands it may be more.

What you pay is lag when you are trying to re-frame picture. You have to get use to it, as lens will try to compensate lens movement as long as it can. It strange sensation at first. Personally I still prefer tripod or even monopod.

haha

grzesja wrote:

VR works with some limitations. It doesn't guarantee good pictures with slow shutter speed. Usually it will be about two f-stops slower than without it. Unless you have very steady hands it may be more.

What you pay is lag when you are trying to re-frame picture. You have to get use to it, as lens will try to compensate lens movement as long as it can. It strange sensation at first. Personally I still prefer tripod or even monopod.

my tripod broke, and so my friend was egging me on to spend $200 on a manfrotto carbon fiber pan/tilt that was on clearance. I hesitated and sure enough, the price is now $400 for the new model, that was closeout. I know this sounds sad, but I ended up with a amazon basics for $24. It even came with a bag to carry it in. It's not as bad as one would think.

.

johnnatash4 wrote:

my tripod broke, and so my friend was egging me on to spend $200 on a manfrotto carbon fiber pan/tilt that was on clearance. I hesitated and sure enough, the price is now $400 for the new model, that was closeout. I know this sounds sad, but I ended up with a amazon basics for $24. It even came with a bag to carry it in. It's not as bad as one would think.

Manfrotto MK294C3-A0RC2 carbon fiber was on sale for $189.88 at B&H photo a couple of days ago. It's no longer available now. Like you, I hesitated but now I want it. I'm using el cheapo tripod too ($1 more than yours smile). It does the job just fine... on a flat surface.

RIP another camera

I happened across my digital camera recently and discovered the battery seems dead. That's two digital cameras I have, that likely would work with the investment of a new battery, now in storage. For me, not worth the few dollars to buy a new battery.

Nothing against those who like a dedicated camera, I like a dedicated gps and that seems needless to some.

It's just that I always have the phone with me and I have to make a decision to carry a dedicated camera. For the quality I require in my pics, the phone camera is good enough.

or none at all

grzesja wrote:

VR works with some limitations. It doesn't guarantee good pictures with slow shutter speed. Usually it will be about two f-stops slower than without it. Unless you have very steady hands it may be more.

What you pay is lag when you are trying to re-frame picture. You have to get use to it, as lens will try to compensate lens movement as long as it can. It strange sensation at first. Personally I still prefer tripod or even monopod.

Tripods are good but a pain to haul around. I know I own two; I don't own any VR lenses, good glass + speed is all I need most of the time.

--
Garmin 38 - Magellan Gold - Garmin Yellow eTrex - Nuvi 260 - Nuvi 2460LMT - Google Nexus 7 - Toyota Entune NAV

.

flaco wrote:
grzesja wrote:

VR works with some limitations. It doesn't guarantee good pictures with slow shutter speed. Usually it will be about two f-stops slower than without it. Unless you have very steady hands it may be more.

What you pay is lag when you are trying to re-frame picture. You have to get use to it, as lens will try to compensate lens movement as long as it can. It strange sensation at first. Personally I still prefer tripod or even monopod.

Tripods are good but a pain to haul around. I know I own two; I don't own any VR lenses, good glass + speed is all I need most of the time.

Can't do long exposure without one. Tripod also helps me take a selfie of me and wife. We don't need help from others.

Lunar Eclipse

I was out there with my Canon on a tripod Sunday night taking pictures of the Bloodmoon/Supermoon. No way could I have gotten those with a handheld smartphone.
Saw people out there with their smartphones and flash on. Just thought to myself "good luck with that".

--
Garmin Nüvi 660 & 3490LMT with ecoRoute HD, Nüvi 855 gone to GPS heaven

Silly!!!

reester wrote:

I was out there with my Canon on a tripod Sunday night taking pictures of the Bloodmoon/Supermoon. No way could I have gotten those with a handheld smartphone.
Saw people out there with their smartphones and flash on. Just thought to myself "good luck with that".

People that use their flash for sunrises and sunsets or moon shots are not up to speed on when to use their flash....

--
Bobby....Garmin 2450LM

They set the flash to auto.

They set the flash to auto. That said, it is possible to have gotten a decent pic of the eclipse with a smartphone, if you put it up to a telescope eyesight. Otherwise, you'd get a washed-out blob.

--
"Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job." --Douglas Adams

Best best part

the best part of the cell phone cameras is you always have your camera with you! and almost never do you let the battery die!
no one want to slug a DSLR around all day all the time.
the phones are getting so hi tech and the cameras are only getting better and better as well.
just my opinion.

Flash

The flash cannot go quite all the way to the moon... sunrise and sunset pictures should have the flash to off....

--
Bobby....Garmin 2450LM

Not me. My camera still

Not me. My camera still takes far better photos than my smart phone.

To quote the old cliche . . .

the best camera is the one that you have with you.

I have a number of acceptable pictures taken with my phone - because it was the only camera I had with me at the time.

I definitely would have preferred to use one of my "real" cameras, but the phone is all I had with me. The results are not as good as if I had used a real camera, but they are acceptable, and I would have had no images on those occasions if I had been dependent on my cameras, so THOSE images would have been UNacceptable.

- Tom -

--
XXL540, GO LIVE 1535, GO 620

To answer the question originally posted....

Me.

I'm not giving up my camera

I'm not giving up my camera anytime soon for my smartphone camera. I will still use a phone camera for convenience as I carry that around all the time. But for travel and special events the camera comes with me whether it's the DSLR or point and shoot. The phone camera just can't beat the low light situations or the telephoto distance.

I think my iPhone is more than adequate...

I think my iPhone 5 is more than adequate for most anything that I would share online. I have a Panasonic point-and-shoot that I bought before my daughter's wedding years ago.

I have had both Nikon and Canon SLR film cameras (and lenses) that I used in the past, but not often enough to justify owning them. I may get a digital SLR someday just on chance that I may want the choice of more control.

A friend (also retired) enjoys his semi-pro nature photography activity. He will hike with a GPS, recording sites to come back and shoot under what he considers ideal conditions. As a former civil engineer, he considers all the angles of the day and season.

He has no kids, but all the toys. He pays for custom printing.

--
Ted - Garmin Nuvi 1450 LM

No me

I have a Nikon Coolpix AW100 and love it. It is waterproof too and very small.

--
Retired Street Pilot C550, Garmin Drive 50 USA+CAN LMT 5, I phone 12 pro.

I love my iPhone but saw this video on YouTube and was imressed

--
If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else. - Yogi Berra
1 ... 3 4 5 6
<<Page 7