Time to arrive question

 

I have a Garmin Nuvi 2300. One of the things that I have noticed is that when driving in the city the estimated time to arrive is never accurate. If I had to guess, I'd say that it seems that the estimated time to arrive doesn't take into consideration that a person would be stopping at red lights.
Is there a setting or something that I can change on the Garmin to allow their time to arrive to become more accurate.

I would think that the thing knows how many lights a user will be going through on your route and it might be able to estimate about how much time a user might be spending at those lights.

Basic answer - NO

You cannot modify the TOA. It basically calculates the time using ideal driving conditions and then recalculates TOA as you encounter "unplanned" delays - lights, traffic which is slower than speed limit, accidents etc.

--
MrKenFL- "Money can't buy you happiness .. But it does bring you a more pleasant form of misery." NUVI 260, Nuvi 1490LMT & Nuvi 2595LMT all with 2014.4 maps !

crystal ball

sonealtx wrote:

I would think that the thing knows how many lights a user will be going through on your route and it might be able to estimate about how much time a user might be spending at those lights.

Assuming the 2300 knew how many traffic lights are between here and there (that it doesn’t know) how would it determine which ones will be red and which green?

--
Garmin 38 - Magellan Gold - Garmin Yellow eTrex - Nuvi 260 - Nuvi 2460LMT - Google Nexus 7 - Toyota Entune NAV

Do Not Expect ....

@sonealtx, welcome to the site.

Many of us would advise that you should not expect too much from your device.

Just wondering - how far off has the unit been? Is it high or low in its estimates?

It depends....

My experience is, if the trip involves mostly freeway on a low traffic day, than the ETA is generally within 15 minutes. Otherwise, you can get the better ETA just by guessing it yourself.

Agreed

I find that long trip estimates are subject to change. The more times I stop to eat the worse the estimate is.

surprise...surprise...

vmfa531 wrote:

I find that long trip estimates are subject to change. The more times I stop to eat the worse the estimate is.

You mean the PND doesn't allow for you to eat? it should take into consideration and have programmed in its calculation how many red lights, meal stops, bathroom breaks you will have per miles traveled otherwise what good is it to have one.

--
Garmin 38 - Magellan Gold - Garmin Yellow eTrex - Nuvi 260 - Nuvi 2460LMT - Google Nexus 7 - Toyota Entune NAV

TOA

I find that the Navigon gps app on my iPhone is significantly more accurate than my Nuvi 3490. In fact, the Navigon app is scarily accurate in terms of updating TOA as conditions change (speed, detours, etc.). The Nuvi is not.

--
Garmin Nuvi 3490, Garmin eTrex 30, Garmin Approach G5

I guess I'm wierd

Don't have a fancy $50 a month phone, just my free 765 Nuvi, you know what, surprize, it dose everything I need for free. If I need to tell someone arrival time, I tell them what my Nuvi says and about what traffic looks like so far. Its always been enough for me, life is too short to see problems that don't exsist!

Seems Close To Me

I have found my 2460 (Veronica) to be pretty good at estimates. When we make extra stops she adds to the time when we restart. If I push the speed a bit and traffic is light she drops a little off the time. I use it a lot when I decide to go a different way, to see how much time she thought she was going to save me, going some non obvious route. It usually only was saving me a minute or two but the fun ones are when my way actually shows up as being faster than her estimate.

Jim...

By the preponderance of the evidence!!!

flaco wrote:
sonealtx wrote:

I would think that the thing knows how many lights a user will be going through on your route and it might be able to estimate about how much time a user might be spending at those lights.

Assuming the 2300 knew how many traffic lights are between here and there (that it doesn’t know) how would it determine which ones will be red and which green?

By the preponderance of the evidence associated with the prevailing conditions, i.e. wind factor, direction wind is blowing, the result of the mood of the red light to give way to the green and the allowance of the yellow not to be jealous that the green light is given president over it????????????
If only we had more important things to be concerned about!!!!!!!

--
Being ALL I can be for HIM! Jesus. Kenwood DNX9980HD Garmin 885t

.

Yep, and the president sets precedence... wink

--
nüvi 3790T | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, will make violent revolution inevitable ~ JFK

Time of Arrival

My experience with the Nuvi 350 & 1350 is that it provides surprisingly good estimates of time of arrival. I'm sure that the algorithms used are quite simple & are based upon not only estimates of the speed allowed on roads but whether you are not keeping up with those speeds (light, traffic jams, etc). I find the info useful & surprisingly good. Obviously, the estimates get better the further along you are on your trip - quite impressive for a VERY simple device.

Fred

Like the OP I found that my

Like the OP I found that my previous Nuvis (350, 660, and 765) we all too optimistic. I am currently with the 3790 and it's a lot more accurate. However, I fins Google navigation on my smartphone to have the most accurate ETA.

TOA

As the trip goes on the GPS will update the time.
Every time the unit resets itself it takes new readings.

--
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things!

.

I will manually toggle "Show Traffic Map" / "Show Normal Map" every once in a while. I do this in the hope that when traffic maps are toggled back on, that will cause the unit to update traffic and ETA. I don't know if it really does anything, but I do it anyway.

My 660

I find that my 660 is real close to the ETA. I watch it change as we stop take a detour or drive a little faster.

--
johnm405 660 & MSS&T

ESTIMATED Time of Arrival

I use the Time of Arrival as an estimate, and do not depend on it for accuracy. As pointed out earlier, it is based on "ideal" driving conditions - and I have NEVER encountered such conditions twisted As for red lights and traffic (and munchies), the GPS just adds the time stopped to the ETA. I have noticed that when I am driving on a highway and going slower than regular highway speeds (winter driving conditions), the Time of Arrival slowly increases.

If I need to be somewhare at a specific time, I just leave earlier! And hope for "decent" driving conditions.

time to arrive

My 250w I would have to say is very accurate as it constantly adjusts the arrival depending on on speed and stop times the same way rally drivers do for there set stages,eg. later arrival = faster speed, earlier arrival = slower speeds.

--
The Home of BLUMARU HOUNDS

Thanks, It is usually

Thanks,
It is usually accurate with highway driving... but in city driving I've seen it off as much as 10 minutes.

surprised?

sonealtx wrote:

Thanks,
It is usually accurate with highway driving... but in city driving I've seen it off as much as 10 minutes.

That is where most traffic lights are located.

--
Garmin 38 - Magellan Gold - Garmin Yellow eTrex - Nuvi 260 - Nuvi 2460LMT - Google Nexus 7 - Toyota Entune NAV

I think the time to arrive

I think the time to arrive assumes you will always be traveling at the speed limit and that every traffic light will be green when you reach it.

You just have to add

You just have to add additional time to the garmin estimate based on the lights and traffic.