Home » Ticket cameras

Red light camera must show "a positive impact on public safety"

 
Thu, 04/11/2013 - 8:08pm

Red light cameras must show that they are actually installed for public safety (on state roads) now in Arizona

http://tinyurl.com/dxk929q

This applies to new camera installations and previously installed cameras will be reviewed every three years.

Signed into law today

‹ Bill introduced in Arizona to ban all RLCs Statewide another case imho for a ticket cam ›
--
Drivesmart 66, Nuvi 2595LMT (Died), Nuvi 1490T (Died), Nuvi 260 (Died), GPSMAP 195 (Departed company)
Fri, 04/12/2013 - 12:46am

good

I wonder how they will put together that data.

Fri, 04/12/2013 - 4:16am

definition

is going to be the key word, what actually shows 'for the public safety'

Sun, 04/14/2013 - 8:36am

Just Arizona

Well this just applies to Arizona. If/until it gets appealed up the chain to the Federal level, it will have no impact on any other state.

--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.
Sun, 04/14/2013 - 9:46am

subjective

I think we've seen it here on this forum, that "rights" outweigh physical safety, in many folks' minds. So this debate really isn't going to get anywhere.

Can you save a life yet at the same time violate a criminal's rights? Many here say the ends do not justify the means. I say when you get more practical and stop being philosophical, you do the right thing.

imho it's a joke to say there is justification to red light running, we need to prove otherwise.

Sat, 05/04/2013 - 1:09pm

Red light camera must show "a positive impact on public safety"

ha ha people speed up more, and slow down only where they see the cam

--
Gattina11