Is this the end for red light cameras?

 

Is this the end for red light cameras?

Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20074493-71/is-this-the-en...

There seems to be a strange whiff of honesty swirling around the robot policemen known as red light cameras.

In different parts of the world, authorities are wondering whether there is any real benefit in having them at all. Yes, even financial benefit.

In the home of the automobile--no, not Detroit, Los Angeles--the Police Commission is, according to MSNBC, requesting that red light cameras should be removed before the Lakers and Clippers begin their new season.

You might wonder whether these objections are based on curiously moral grounds. Well, some objectors do, indeed, believe that red light cameras are merely insidious machines that generate revenue for strapped (or merely spendthrift) local councils.

However, in LA it seems that these things might not even make money. The city reportedly only receives a mere one-third of the revenue that the cameras generate. Which might suggest that the city could use the money saved by removing the cameras to hire better contract negotiators.

Amusingly (for some), MSNBC reported that the costs of operating the cameras exceeds the revenue generated by between $1 million and $1.5 million--and that's when tickets are $446. Which suggests that the money saved by removing the cameras might be used to hire better financial estimators.

Angelenos are, oddly, not keen on actually paying for these tickets, and judges, even more oddly, seem reluctant to enforce them. More oddly still, there was reportedly no great increase in safety numbers either.

While even Arizona last year announced that its cameras would be removed, news today reaches me of a rather innovative approach to the social philosophy of the machine.

For the Telegraph reports that U.K. authorities, in a fit of bizarre openness, have decided to tell drivers precisely which cameras are mere cash-cows and which might save a life or two.

It seems that local councils will now only be given mere weeks before they must publish figures that compare particular intersections before and after the cameras were installed. The police will also have to inform the public of exactly how many tickets were issued and what the results were.

Naturally, as soon as these numbers are published, there will be mathematical geniuses who will begin to lobby furiously--especially if it happens that most of the cameras merely generate cash without offering any civic safety qualities at all.

How strange it might be if this particular piece of technology was decided to be, well, useless. Useless save for being a cash machine, that is.

I hope they remove them all

I hope the authorities remove them all based on public opinion or poll. those devices are some ridiculous attempt to pull more money from people.
it's not like you RUN a red light to get a ticket, no you just try to cross the intersection when it's still orange and get caught in the middle when light turns red (can't even see it anymore often).

cash cows yes, safety devices? I don't think so. I would be interested in seeing those safety report from before and after for each and every intersection or spot they got installed ...

--
Garmin nuvi 2595LMT; Android 5.0 (Samsung GS3)

Accidents Increase After Red Light Cameras

The National Motorists Association claims that the accident rate increases after red light cameras are installed: http://blog.motorists.org/red-light-cameras-increase-acciden...

--
Garmin Nuvi 1690

Did not read it that way

This article was posted on January 8th, 2008.

It reports “quotes” from 5 studies and, using these quotes, concludes that cameras increase accidents.

I like to read the full study and see what the abstract and/or conclusion parts of the studies say. None of them seem to provide much support for opponents of Automated Traffic Enforcement on their face. Note that the studies are old – implying that the National Motorists Association was unable to find any damning recent studies.

1). A Long Term Study of Red-Light Cameras and Accidents
David Andreassen
Australian Road Research Board
February, 1995
This study is quite old. Its conclusion says:
“The original choice of the RLC sites must be questioned. Three-quarters of the sites had initial annual frequencies of two or less reported ‘adjacent approaches’ accidents. Low frequency sites are not good candidates for testing the effectiveness of accident countermeasures.
The results of this study suggest that the installation of the RLC at these sites did not provide any reduction in accidents, rather there has been an increase in rear end and adjacent approaches accidents on a before and after basis and also by comparison with the changes in accidents at intersection signals.
There has also been no demonstrated value of the RLC as an effective countermeasure.”

2) The Impact of Red Light Cameras (Photo-Red Enforcement) on Crashes in Virginia
Virginia Transportation Research Council
June 2007
The study abstract says:
“These results cannot be used to justify the widespread installation of cameras because they are not universally effective. These results also cannot be used to justify the abolition of cameras, as they have had a positive impact at some intersections and in some jurisdictions. The report recommends, therefore, that the decision to install a red light camera be made on an intersection-by-intersection basis. In addition, it is recommended that a carefully controlled experiment be conducted to examine further the impact of red light programs on safety and to determine how an increase in rear-end crashes can be avoided at specific intersections.

3) The Red-Light Running Crisis: Is It Intentional?
Office of the Majority Leader
U.S. House of Representatives
May 2001
This was decidedly not a “study” and what it did was try to discredit other studies which claimed that Automated Traffic Enforcement reduced “overall” collisions by pointing out that “rear end” collisions had increased.

4) Investigation Of Crash Risk Reduction Resulting From Red-Light Cameras In Small Urban Areas
Mark Burkey, Ph.D. & Kofi Obeng, Ph.D.
North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University
July 2004
The conclusion of this study does not seem particularly damning. It said
“Our findings are more pessimistic, finding no change in angle accidents and large increases in rear-end crashes and many other types of crashes relative to other intersections. We did find a decrease in accidents involving a vehicle turning left and a vehicle on the same roadway, which may have been included as an angle accident in some other studies. However, given that these left turn accidents occur only one third as often as angle accidents, and the fact that we find no benefit from decreasing severity of accidents suggests that there has been no demonstrable benefit from the RLC program in terms of safety. In many ways, the evidence points toward the installation of RLCs as a detriment to safety.”

5) Evaluation of the Red-Light-Camera-Enforcement Pilot Project
Ontario Ministry of Transportation
December 2003
The numbers generated in this study were not based on accidents before and after implementation. They were based on “expected” accidents and actual accidents.

Not Everywhere

feniks wrote:

it's not like you RUN a red light to get a ticket, no you just try to cross the intersection when it's still orange and get caught in the middle when light turns red (can't even see it anymore often).

I don't know where you live, and what your traffic laws say, but this is clearly not the law in New York State. In NYS, as long as you enter the intersection while the light is yellow, you can continue through, even if it turns red while you are in the intersection, without receiving a ticket.

Take a look on-line for videos of RLC violators - you will see it isn't just people who get caught in the intersection when the light changes. There are many outrageous, dangerous examples of people in cars, trucks, buses, and other vehicles that blatantly run lights long after they have turned red. I've seen it personally - more than once, I've had some guy following behind me, and when the light turns red and I stop (at a normal pace...) he swings into the left-turn lane to pass me and blow through the light.

--
The Moose Is Loose! nuvi 760

very interesting...

if they generate 10 tickets per month, they are still "good" revenue.

Hate when that happens

Moose135 wrote:
feniks wrote:

red. I've seen it personally - more than once, I've had some guy following behind me, and when the light turns red and I stop (at a normal pace...) he swings into the left-turn lane to pass me and blow through the light.

I usually get that here. Except in NY they pass you with the horn blowing and the finger waving....errr.

--
nüvi 3590LMT "always backup your files"

got ticketed for that in Newark, NJ

yeah I learned driving in Europe with same rules, once you are in intersection even though it's red you can stay there and attempt to leave it once it's safe (at earliest convenience)... but no, not in NJ!

I've got a red light ticket ($80) for "running a red light" in Newark, NJ like a year ago... now I drive over there like an idiot, doing a hard brake stop whenever I see the yellow light coming up ahead of me... it's just stupid ... I can believe it can cause more collisions (e.g. sleepy driver behind you rear ending your car) than helping to avoid them by red light runners ... kinda like it doesn't add up if you look at the big picture ...

Moose135 wrote:
feniks wrote:

it's not like you RUN a red light to get a ticket, no you just try to cross the intersection when it's still orange and get caught in the middle when light turns red (can't even see it anymore often).

I don't know where you live, and what your traffic laws say, but this is clearly not the law in New York State. In NYS, as long as you enter the intersection while the light is yellow, you can continue through, even if it turns red while you are in the intersection, without receiving a ticket.

Take a look on-line for videos of RLC violators - you will see it isn't just people who get caught in the intersection when the light changes. There are many outrageous, dangerous examples of people in cars, trucks, buses, and other vehicles that blatantly run lights long after they have turned red. I've seen it personally - more than once, I've had some guy following behind me, and when the light turns red and I stop (at a normal pace...) he swings into the left-turn lane to pass me and blow through the light.

--
Garmin nuvi 2595LMT; Android 5.0 (Samsung GS3)

check the rear view

feniks wrote:

~snip~ now I drive over there like an idiot, doing a hard brake stop whenever I see the yellow light coming up ahead of me... ~snip~

Be sure to look in the rear view before doing that, an $80 ticket is cheaper than the deductable for repairs.

--
. 2 Garmin DriveSmart 61 LMT-S, Nuvi 2689, 2 Nuvi 2460, Zumo 450, Uniden R3 radar detector with GPS built in, includes RLC info. Uconnect 430N Garmin based, built into my Jeep. .

RLC POI?

with RLC/speed POI, I can be well prepared even I go to areas I am not familiar with. Always maintain reasonable speed whenever POI alerts sound, I do not remember I had problems on this.

Redlight Cameras

Maybe L.A. will be doing away with them but the Mayor of Montgomery, Alabama says he's going to double the number here. I'm also seeing them in other cities in the Southeast that did not previously have them.

Just added more here

Here in Kingsport, TN, there has been two more cameras added. They went into operation yesterday. They are red light cameras but one or both of them is also a speed camera. I really don't like those things and the thing I don't like most about them is some faraway company is making money from them. The city gets half of the ticket. I think I would feel different about it if the city was the soul investor and maintainer of the cameras. I just don't feel good about that.

--
Jerry

Still A Revenue Generator....

Steevo wrote:

While even Arizona last year announced that its cameras would be removed, news today reaches me of a rather innovative approach to the social philosophy of the machine.
offering any civic safety qualities at all.

How strange it might be if this particular piece of technology was decided to be, well, useless. Useless save for being a cash machine, that is.

Arizona got rid of the freeway cameras last year. The various municipalities still have their redlidght cameras and radar vans. Actually there are more and more redlight cameras going up in various cities as they are an easy way for the cities, especially smaller out of the way towns, to generate some much needed money...from out-of-towners/visitors.

--
OK.....so where the heck am I?