Traffic lights and stop signs taken into consideration when mapping a route?

 

Hi,
I'm curious to know if the Nuvi 350 has knowledge of where stop signs and traffic lights are located when mapping a route to it's destination.

I drive on local roads in NYC and the Nuvi 350 tends to ask me go on roads that are major roadways where there are more traffic and traffic lights.

On small roads running parallel to the major road, there are less traffic lights and sometimes a few stop signs. There is also less traffic congestion.

If I were to pick a faster time as an option, I figured that the nuvi would know where traffic lights and stop signs are located. This would make the trip to it's destination faster.

Sometimes I would press the detour option and it will still tell me to get back on a major roadway. If I were to deviate from the planned route, it will keep telling me to turn at the next block and then the next block and the next until I get back on the major roadway.

Will a traffic receiver make a difference for mapping a route? The receiver will let you know where the traffic congestion is located. But I don't think it will help the nuvi map a more efficient route in terms of knowing where there are less traffic lights and stop signs.

avoid highways

Try setting it to avoid highways.

--
........Garmin StreetPilot c550 / Nüvi 765...........

Oooops....Let me clarify major roadway

lsmonop wrote:

Try setting it to avoid highways.

Sorry...Let me clarify major roadway. I didn't mean highway. In my area, it would tell me to take a major roadway that has 2 lanes or more as opposed to taking the single lane road where it's more residential. The major roadway would be a major avenue or boulevard.

Even if I don't set it to avoid highways, it already knows not to go on a highway. It's just that I would like to avoid roadways where there are a lot of traffic lights and stop signs.

Sometimes there is a route which is one block away running parallel to the big road with a lot less traffic lights and stop signs.

how?

hobby wrote:
lsmonop wrote:

Try setting it to avoid highways.

Sorry...Let me clarify major roadway. I didn't mean highway. In my area, it would tell me to take a major roadway that has 2 lanes or more as opposed to taking the single lane road where it's more residential. The major roadway would be a major avenue or boulevard.

Even if I don't set it to avoid highways, it already knows not to go on a highway. It's just that I would like to avoid roadways where there are a lot of traffic lights and stop signs.

Sometimes there is a route which is one block away running parallel to the big road with a lot less traffic lights and stop signs.

How does it know this?

Try the bicycle setting, just watch out for the one way streets.

--
........Garmin StreetPilot c550 / Nüvi 765...........

Traffic lights and stop signs

hobby wrote:

Hi,
I'm curious to know if the Nuvi 350 has knowledge of where stop signs and traffic lights are located when mapping a route to it's destination.

I believe that the answer is that it doesn't know about locations of traffic lights and stop signs. I does know about types of roads.

--
Garmin StreetPilot c530, Mapsource

That's too much to ask for

That's too much to ask for such little gadget. Human brain is about 200 times faster than the fastest computer in the world. No wonder you find a better route.

I also live in nyc

Being a New Yorker, I understand what you are asking but I think the answer is no. Using a GPS in NYC can frequently be a hassle as traffic, lights, and other numerous issues are always going to be around more than in many other cities. The GPS is a great device if you don't know more than it knows, but the minute you know more than it does, then it is almost usless.

It really is a very simple machine and will never compete with a person that has lived in NYC for many years and knows the local traffic patterns. Especially in NYC, a town that was built before cars existed. I believe another issue is that your GPS, if it is set to "fastest," will choose routes based on speed limit average on those "major" roads but it doesn't know that traffic, stop signs, and lights may be more frequent on those "major" roads.

That said, when I visit places like LA and Florida and use my GPS, friends will frequently tell me that the route my GPS picks is slower or longer than their route. However, once they have taken the GPS's route they usually reconsider and say, "Wow! That was fast! I never considered going that route!" LOL.

As for the traffic receiver, I think it is a huge waist of money in NYC. Too many roads here to keep track of and the service only shows issues on the larger roads and highways like the BQE. The news barely keeps up with traffic issues here in the big city. Your best bet is to go the way you want to go and turn 1010 wins on the radio if you feel you need traffic info.

--
Garmin Legend, Quest, and Nuvi 350, currently Nuvi 855 (and my Palm Pre w/ Sprint Nav)

It seems that the nuvi always pick the longest route

Thanks! It seems that every time I pick a route, it knows to get back on a major road and go the long way. I just wondering why it wouldn't stay on the same small road and continue until I'm near it's destination.

In any case, it's good to know. Although including traffic lights and stop signs would be a good feature, I guess it wouldn't be feasible.

Thanks again!

Living in NYC

Considering that one cannot predict traffic, all things being equal I still find that for the most part these units provide, faster and better alternative routes. Most people tend to be locked into and swear by their favorite routes, as being the fastest.

--
kingly