America’s GPS System Is Vulnerable. We Need A Backup

 

https://www.baltimoresun.com/2025/08/04/americas-gps-system-...

The entire U.S. economy rests on a single point of failure — 12,500 miles above us. It’s called GPS, and its loss would be catastrophic. Fortunately, the Trump administration is uniquely positioned to prevent this looming threat.

The Global Positioning System (GPS) isn’t just about finding your way with Google Maps. It powers the backbone of American life — banking, the electric grid, logistics, health care, emergency services, agriculture and transportation hubs. Lose GPS, and we lose our economy. The cost? An estimated $1 billion per day. Ports would halt. ATMs and digital payments would stop. Planes, ambulances and even tractors would be paralyzed.

There is no Plan B.

The Russians have a terrestrial backup. The Chinese do as well. Where’s ours?

The U.S. used to have one — but we shut it down. The system, called LORAN, was a World War II-era ground-based navigation network. Though not as precise as GPS, it offered reliable location and timing data. President George W. Bush proposed modernizing it in 2004. But funding stalled, and under the Obama administration, the system was dismantled — deemed obsolete in a satellite-first era.

Bad call.

Fast forward to today: In conflict zones like Ukraine and the Middle East, GPS jammers and spoofers are already being used on the battlefield. Just a year ago, Congressman Mike Turner, former chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, warned that Russia is developing a nuclear anti-satellite weapon capable of wiping out satellites in orbit — including GPS.

Congress saw the danger during President Donald Trump’s first term and passed legislation directing the Department of Transportation to build a GPS backup. But the funds never came through. President Trump issued an executive order urging action, but without funding and urgency, the effort stalled.

Here’s the good news: We don’t need to start from scratch. The infrastructure already exists today. America’s 1,800 commercial and public television stations can deliver precise timing and location signals using a technology called NextGen Broadcasting (also known as ATSC 3.0). This advanced standard, approved by the Trump FCC, transforms traditional over-the-air TV into a robust data delivery network.

Many stations have already adopted NextGen. The rest are waiting for the FCC to sunset the outdated current standard and greenlight the nationwide switch. Once that happens, broadcasters can provide the critical services needed to back up GPS. It’s fast, cheap and already built.

President Trump and his team understand the urgency. His administration is uniquely aligned with broadcasters and technologists who have worked for years to make this solution viable. Now, we just need the political will to finish the job.

The threat is real, the solution is here, and time is running out.

The Trump administration is poised to do this. It can’t come fast enough. Just ask yourself — what’s more in the public’s interest than protecting our way of life?

Broadcasters are ready to step up.

Jerald Fritz is the former chief of staff to Federal Communications Commission Chair Mark Fowler and a former board member of the National Association of Broadcasters. He served as general counsel and strategic planner for television broadcasters, including Allbritton Communications and ONE Media, a subsidiary of Sinclair Broadcast Group, whose executive chairman is The Baltimore Sun’s principal owner David Smith.

The problem is the political

The problem is the political will is lacking. Government is effectively paralyzed, and is I feel a prime reason this country is in such a sorry state. Worse, no one seems to know what to do to fix it.

I think I know, but my solution would be radical.

--
"Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job." --Douglas Adams

not really backups

Neither LORAN nor the mentioned NextGen Broadcasting scheme could be a backup anytime in the near-term future for the simple reason that essentially none of the current things which use GPS for various purposes can receive them.

It would be a huge investment to get even a small fraction of receiving devices to gain the ability to use either resource.

Consider just your own consumer GPS receiver--think it can use these? I doubt it. Neither can my car (Tesla). Neither can the receivers which use super-accurate time derived from GPS to get critical synch done in communications networks.

The next question would be: "so what threat to GPS would not take the trouble to wipe out the backup as well?"

--
personal GPS user since 1992

Will Atomic clocks work?

AAA roadmaps may be seeing a

AAA roadmaps may be seeing a comeback smile

Design, manufacture, and ship them overnight?

I wonder: how many devices use GPS as a primary source and how many use proxies? Do e.g. ATMs have a GPS chip and antenna or use timing from perhaps a cellphone signal? The only video standard where I had a rudimentary understanding was NTSC so that dates me!

I presume the article meant to include Glonass, Galileo and all the other G....s.

Having a plan b is a start. What about all the devices with embedded GPS etc. chips? Do large and expensive controls for our power grid need replacement? Design, manufacture, and ship them overnight?

How precise & accurate is the ATSC timing? Will some uses require their own caesium clocks?

On the home network, I have

On the home network, I have several targets for NTP. I'm not sure exactly how it correlates the data from them (there's 4). All other devices are pointed to the firewall for precise time. If a device tries to go offnetwork for a time source, firewall intercepts and redirects request back to itself.

I'm not sure if there's security/encryption involved. Compromising time can lead to a whole mess of things.

Presentation supporting ATSC

--
John from PA

Hardware support

archae86 wrote:

Neither LORAN nor the mentioned NextGen Broadcasting scheme could be a backup anytime in the near-term future for the simple reason that essentially none of the current things which use GPS for various purposes can receive them.

It would be a huge investment to get even a small fraction of receiving devices to gain the ability to use either resource.

Consider just your own consumer GPS receiver--think it can use these? I doubt it. Neither can my car (Tesla). Neither can the receivers which use super-accurate time derived from GPS to get critical synch done in communications networks.

The next question would be: "so what threat to GPS would not take the trouble to wipe out the backup as well?"

I'm inferring from this article
https://www.consumerreports.org/electronics/emerging-technol...
that GPS (either standalone or built-in to a vehicle or smartphone) would need an ATSC 3.0 tuner to make sense of the signal. Most likely, current consumer devices do not have this tuner, as arch suggests. I don't see any discussion of this issue in the slideshow linked in John in PA's post. Did I miss it?

--
"141 could draw faster than he, but Irving was looking for 143..."

ATSC 3.0

A big problem is public acceptance of ATSC 3.0 or NextGen TV. It will render nearly all current televisions unable to receive over the air broadcasts when the current digital TV standard is ended. You would need to buy a new TV or a converter box. The broadcast industry is pushing ATSC 3.0 because it will allow them to push specific advertising tailored to individual viewers, and it includes encrypted DRM limiting how and where you can watch the TV programs. There really is not any benefit to the consumer with ATSC 3.0