L.A. pursues fines from red-light camera tickets after killing program

 

LA Times October 27, 2011

As the Los Angeles City Council voted this week to pay its defunct red-light camera program's operator to process outstanding citations, a statewide advocacy group released a scathing report of such traffic-ticket operations, saying agreements with vendors tend to focus "more on profits than safety."

"Too often, local governments are taken for a ride by red-light camera vendors overly focused on their bottom line instead of public safety," said Pedro Morillas, legislative director for the California Public Interest Research Group, which published the report Thursday.

The group argues that in many cities across the country where privatized red-light camera programs are enforced, simpler and cheaper potential solutions — such as lengthening the times of yellow lights — are ignored because cities and contractors are more focused on raising revenue by issuing more tickets.

The City Council voted to get rid of its red-light camera program in July. Many council members said they voted to end the program after it became clear the Los Angeles Superior Court, citing due process concerns, was not aggressively enforcing those tickets and because claims that the cameras increased safety were dubious.
The council voted 11-2 on Wednesday to pay American Traffic Solutions about $11,000 a month to help process fines from the approximately 50,000 citations that remain outstanding.

Officials said the contractor was needed to process the fines because they held the database containing necessary photos and other evidence and that the contract should be terminated as soon as the contractor’s fee exceeds incoming revenue from unprocessed tickets.

all about money

those evidence should be forwarded to court without delay...

The evidence should also be

The evidence should also be taken into account at the Ballot box!!

Fred

in a way

Isn't it funny here in the USA we are always bogged-down in semantics and debate, while in say Germany it's understood that there are cameras everywhere? Yet they can have unlimited speeds on the autobahn, while we can't even seem to grasp the notion of accelerating, not braking on an on ramp, alternate merge, etc.? It's hilarious to think the US Constitution protects our right to sail through red lights.

Stopping at a Highway Entrance

johnnatash4 wrote:

...while we can't even seem to grasp the notion of accelerating, not braking on an on ramp...

Here on Long Island we have stop lights at highway entrances. I'll bet nobody else has that.

The government says it is to avoid too many cars entering at the same time and give a better flow of traffic on the highway.

Everyone I know thinks it is just stupid.

We have em in Arizona too

Bunch of them in Phoenix

on ramp lights

I have not seen the ones on the Northern State Pkwy work in quite a while, are they still using them?

--
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things!

At The Risk

At the risk of constantly repeating myself: "When it's not about the money, it's about the money.".

--
Bob: My toys: Nüvi 1390T, Droid X2, Nook Color (rooted), Motorola Xoom, Kindle 2, a Yo-Yo and a Slinky. Gotta have toys.

Stopping At A Highway Entrance

On certain roads at certain times like rush hour they have them in Ontario too. Drivers would just keep trying to merge until everything came to a stop. It still does on practically every merge not regulated on the QEW and 401 during rush hour.

Doug

--
Nüvi 3790

Chicago

jmckeogh wrote:

Here on Long Island we have stop lights at highway entrances. I'll bet nobody else has that.

The government says it is to avoid too many cars entering at the same time and give a better flow of traffic on the highway.

Everyone I know thinks it is just stupid.

We have them in Chicago as well. Doesn't help with traffic on surface streets, but it does help with people that think synchronized merging is a good idea.

I agree

FZbar wrote:

The evidence should also be taken into account at the Ballot box!!

Fred

Vote the individuals out. Clean house.

--
With God, all things are possible. ——State motto of the Great State of Ohio

Agree

johnnatash4 wrote:

... It's hilarious to think the US Constitution protects our right to sail through red lights.

Boy, ain't that the truth, although in this case, it seems to be state constitutions/regulations that are doing it. Agree with the sentiment, though.

--
Nuvi 2460