Xerox picked for red light camera program in Chicago

 
--
If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else. - Yogi Berra

Xeron has been in the news lately

I would think they would be busy enough trying to stop their copiers from changing numbers when they make a copy:

http://it.slashdot.org/story/13/08/06/1240215/xerox-photocop...

So now we have red light cameras managed by a company who makes copiers that falsify the output. What could go wrong?

Life must be getting tough

Life must be getting tough for Xerox that they have to get into a "guaranteed" revenue stream!

At least they've got the paperwork handled.

Fred

For those interested

Frovingslosh wrote:

I would think they would be busy enough trying to stop their copiers from changing numbers when they make a copy:

http://it.slashdot.org/story/13/08/06/1240215/xerox-photocop...

So now we have red light cameras managed by a company who makes copiers that falsify the output. What could go wrong?

The use of "changing numbers" and "falsify" seems to have been used to imply that Xerox has been chosen because there might be future collusion to issue improper tickets.

If anyone is interested in the details, they can read
http://realbusinessatxerox.blogs.xerox.com/2013/08/07/update...

Realize that "copiers" can also be used as "scanners". There is absolutely no indication that a "copy" of a document will not be just that. The issue, admitted by Xerox, has to do with scanning "stress documents" where the user is making changes to the factory default settings (eg. enlargement).

A "stress document" is described as documents with small fonts and those already scanned multiple times.

?

FZbar wrote:

Life must be getting tough for Xerox that they have to get into a "guaranteed" revenue stream!

At least they've got the paperwork handled.

Fred

I was wondering what you were implying about Xerox

Quote:

get[ting] into a "guaranteed" revenue stream

no, it is on factory settings

Just in case anyone bought into the statement that this was happening when users were making changes to the factory settings, there was a follow-up story where Xerox, as well as the researcher, confirmed that this was happening while the machine was still ON FACTORY SETTINGS:

http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/13/08/10/1241249/xerox-co...